Supreme Court weighs whether law reducing crack cocaine sentences is retroactive

now viewing

Supreme Court weighs whether law reducing crack cocaine sentences is retroactive

November 5, 2024 villagechief

now playing

Vice President Harris Lays Out a Bold Vision and Pledges Unity in White House Ellipse Speech

November 5, 2024 villagechief

now playing

Congresswoman Nikema Williams, Shirley Franklin & women in 34 GA counties "Overload the Polls" on First Day of Early Voting

November 5, 2024 villagechief

now playing

Rep. Nikema Williams, Former Mayor Shirley Franklin, Helen Butler, Mobilize Voters for First Day of Early Voting

November 5, 2024 villagechief

now playing

Digital Underground Co-Founder Chopmaster J Drops Tribute Album to His 5th Grade Classmate, VP Kamala Harris

November 5, 2024 villagechief

now playing

Vivica A. Fox Shines in a Heartfelt and Feisty Role in "The Lost Holiday" Directed by Jussie Smollett

November 5, 2024 villagechief

Pin It

By Robert Barnes, The Washington Post – It was in a rare burst of bipartisanship that Congress in 2010 passed the Fair Sentencing Act, which attempted to close the sentencing gap between those convicted of crack cocaine offenses, who tend to be black, and those with powdered cocaine offenses, who tend to be white.

But Congress left a key bit of the legislation unexplained: whether the reduced sentences for crack should apply to those who committed their crimes before the law took effect but who were not sentenced until afterward.

An hour-long argument at the Supreme Court on Tuesday did not seem to produce a definitive answer.

Lawmakers intended for the new sentencing structure to take effect immediately, said Stephen B. Eberhardt, a lawyer arguing for two Illinois men who did not receive the benefits of the measure even though they were sentenced after President Obama signed it in August 2010. Read the full story at The WashingtonPost.com

Pin It

Post Views: 617